It’s been a long day and a fun evening…I’m quite tired.
There’s a lot about Pittsburgh politics/government that don’t make sense to me. The drink tax is one thing. I don’t think it’s fair that every person who wants to enjoy a glass of wine or beer or whatever inside the Allegheny county lines should have to fund the Port Authority. It’s not fair that small business owners are forced to charge higher prices. Public Transportation is important, but it is not a given, and when a public agency has been mismanaged for so long, why is it my responsibility, as an occasional drinker, to pay for it? Or why is a restaurant owner – a person taking a financial risk yet trying to contribute to the county’s economy – responsible?
But, that’s not even my biggest problem with the whole issue. Lately, groups have been pushing to get the drink tax on a ballot this November. Wow–what a modern notion…let the VOTERS decide if they want their drinks to be taxed in order to fund anything – let alone a corrupt Port Authority.
Leave it to Pittsburgh and Allegheny County to screw that up. Shady Dan Onorato and his cronies have somehow fixed it so the referendum that was up for vote tonight goes something like this: voters can vote to have the drink tax…OR have their property taxes increased.
WHAT?
For those of you unfamiliar with Allegheny County politics, property taxes are a hot issue around here. I guess because they were being raised and raised a few years back because the morons running this area have no idea what they’re doing.
Anyway, I need to read up more on the issue and all of the proceedings (which I will do, don’t you worry!). But I would like to ask these crazy politicians one thing – particularly Dan Onorato (who thinks he’s PA’s Governor-in-training): why does repealing the drink tax automatically mean that property taxes have to be raised? I don’t see or understand the correlation to a tax on drinks (that are already taxed once through the state’s liquor system - don’t get me started on that) and property taxes. I understand that decades of fraud and bad behavior at the Port Authority have caused the agency to be totally strapped for cash. I don’t agree with funding it through taxation, but I’ll save that argument for later. I don’t see how there are just NO OTHER OPTIONS other than two – drink or property taxes – to fund the county’s transportation.
Dan, can you please explain that to me? Because from where I’m sitting, it just looks like you and your County Council buddies are dropping the property tax card just to make sure the drink tax isn’t repealed.
1 response so far ↓
Katie // July 30, 2008 at 12:48 pm |
Boo!!!! I shouldn’t have to be thinking like this, but thanks to the current situation, I am: They did not add an extra tax to the alcohol we buy at beer distributors and liquor stores, right? So, we buy it in large quantities and drink at home (and pray they don’t raise our property takes anyway)! Wait, that still doesn’t help restaurant owners…Oh well, let’s just go back to prohibition AND raise property taxes…Please tell me that’s not coming next (however, if anyone could figure out how to make moonshine in the basement, it’s my husband and best friend!)!